Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin
New planet hints we're very lucky—or our models are wrong (arstechnica.com)
33 points by soundsop on Aug 28, 2009 | hide | past | favorite | 5 comments


The planet is sentient. It constantly swings its tides out to create momentum that prevents it from falling into the star.



...and this is powered by energy from the vacuum?


If the star is <1.5 billion years old, and the planet is expected to fall into that star in <1 million years, how did that planet have both time to form (which would have occurred far away) and to have its orbit decay?


The idea is that it formed farther away, and has been "falling" the whole time, and it's just about to hit the star. Which is dismissed as an unlikely coincidence, but maybe.

We should be able to find out soon.

If it's really that close, and the existing estimate for Q is correct, the orbital period should change measurably within the next year or two.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: