> Remember when the internet of military contractors got exfiltrated because the CI/CD pipeline of a firewall vendor got breached? Guess what their password was: solarwinds123
So I get to be punished because of incompetent military contractors?
I read it. My point isn't that this is bad. My point is that it's a solution that imposes a large enough burden on at least some people that it's not automatically an unambiguous win. For me, it represents a large enough burden that if it were forced on me, I'd just stop using the web sites doing so.
Which, you have to admit, is the most secure option. All security measures represent a tradeoff, and sometimes that tradeoff is not worth it.
So I get to be punished because of incompetent military contractors?