Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Living in the US, I trust Apple with securing my communications (I don't have high security needs). I don't exactly trust third party developers. So, three no need for me to use something outside of Apple's apps, unless its something that don't provide. If these apps could prove they were better, id consider them, but all these lawsuits just sound like inferior products trying to force themselves onto a platform they should be on.


> We believe that Apple’s conduct, as detailed in the complaint we filed, constitutes further violations of US antitrust law.

It's not a question of what you like, it's a question of antitrust laws. You can disagree with them of course, but it is their right to sue Apple if they think Apple is breaking laws.


This is exactly what it is. They're trying to force Apple to design an inferior (imo) product so they can make more money.


But isnt Apple forcing an inferior product (Subscriptions API) to make more money themselves (and serving copious amounts of kool-aid for people to drink up?).

Lets be honest here - Netflix, Spotify et al are perfectly capable of running their on subscription business. They dont NEED Apple's crappy payment provider, and yet are forced to use it.

As a user you should be enraged, but here we are.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: