Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Default locking every process onto a random chiplet doesn't sound like a great plan either.


AFAIK it doesn’t lock them, it just preferentially co-schedules things into a socket.


My understanding was that a thread is only eligible to be scheduled in a single processor group at any given time, and that windows will not change the group. Is that wrong?


That WAS correct. They corrected that after realising a 96-core processor has less cores available than a 64-core processor since processor groups split cores evenly.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: