If nature is a woman (rather than a collection of stochastic processes), then she is a strong argument against letting women into the same building as a computer.
This along with the following paragraph come across as somewhat misogynistic. I'm sure you didn't mean it to. Saying "person" instead of "women" would have avoided that.
I liked your description of nature's methodology as a development process.
The meat of my post was a factual counterpoint to Tichy's, and it amused me to make a stylistic counterpoint as well (namely mocking his Gaia-worshipping tone, which anthropomorphizes a random process).
So yes, I did mean to make it sound somewhat mysogynistic.
This along with the following paragraph come across as somewhat misogynistic. I'm sure you didn't mean it to. Saying "person" instead of "women" would have avoided that.
I liked your description of nature's methodology as a development process.