> By the same token, do you have scientific evidence that they’re helped by not having a blue screen?
Yes, it is clear that the person I'm replying to has more experience in this field; I'm just a "simple consumer" of movies. However, having experience can sometimes blind you from inconvenient facts. I think the burden is on the industry to prove that new technologies have no negative effect on the end product.
The effect on the viewer is more important than the actor. It's our job to make it interesting no matter what the circumstances. You are just supposed to enjoy it (enough to spend your money on it).
Audiences definitely like practicals, even when they aren't as realistic. People adore Baby Yoda even though it's obviously a puppet ... in fact because it's obviously a puppet.
They also react very positively to the Volume, which is so much better than blue screen even though it's just as fake to the actor. (They're usually not even looking that direction.)
Yes, it is clear that the person I'm replying to has more experience in this field; I'm just a "simple consumer" of movies. However, having experience can sometimes blind you from inconvenient facts. I think the burden is on the industry to prove that new technologies have no negative effect on the end product.