It's hilarious to see the naysayers about Bitcoin say that BTC is not usable. Now it's worth almost 50 grand and all they can come up with is expensive transaction fees which in hindsight, are really not that expensive, and the energy consumption of maintaining the Bitcoin network.
It sure is a lot better than using human lives, usually & most likely forced labor, to mine real Gold. Right? After all, energy is free when you're using solar power to mine your Bitcoins or any other coins. Does the energy really goes to waste when it provides heating? Etc?
It just seems like people are running out of excuses at this point. I wonder what they'll be saying when BTC hits $100,000.
The State printing fiat money is essentially stealing time from people who have laboured to create wealth. That wealth is pilfered through devaluing the money supply, with those close to central bank who receive the new money first benefiting from it.
Bitcoin fixes this theft problem, and demand for it will continue to increase for as long as this theft occurs.
The only way bitcoin can be stopped is if central banks start contracting the supply of their money, which you and I know will never happen.
> governments can print fiat money at will, with virtually no energy
I get what you're saying, but that's not really true. You have to account for the military spending required to preserve the legitimacy of your fiat currency. Any nation-state can afford the same printing presses you have.
And what is the cost of the massive capacity for and monopoly on violence that nation-states derive this capability to print money out of thin air from?
It sure is a lot better than using human lives, usually & most likely forced labor, to mine real Gold. Right? After all, energy is free when you're using solar power to mine your Bitcoins or any other coins. Does the energy really goes to waste when it provides heating? Etc?
It just seems like people are running out of excuses at this point. I wonder what they'll be saying when BTC hits $100,000.