Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I complained here when the Windows Subsystem for Linux was released that Microsoft was capitulating to Linux, giving customers a migration path away from Windows. That Microsoft had lost confidence in the homespun Win32/Win64/UWP/... API's to court developers. I caught some flak for that, but I was right.

Here, again, we see Microsoft signalling surrender in a HUGE market. Why should I be troubled to run Windows 10, again? Where is the technical distinctiveness in rebranding Chromium? There is no advantage to Microsoft in doing that. It's less disgraceful to keep building out Edge than to rebrand Chromium.

I'm not claiming Microsoft has done a great job. Edge was another mixed bag in a long line of mixed bags on the Web front from Microsoft. But they did compete for a really long time with no shortage of technical distinctiveness. Active Desktop, in the right product manager's hands, could have been a really amazing system. IE6, when it came out, was technically very awesome, doing HTML5-like functionality 7 years before the other browser vendors.

I'd wager open sourcing Windows is next because they're not doing the brand any favors; they'll dump it and move on. Microsoft will focus on Azure and SaaS apps or whatever new market crops up and we'll all be poorer for it.

Windows 7 will be my last Windows unless some amazing direction change happens in the product. I'm just waiting for support to end. Debian Linux, here I come!



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: