Over the weekend I was running the same prompt across GPT-5.2, Gemini 3, and Grok. Both Gemini 3 and Grok on thinking mode finished within 2 minutes. GPT-5.2 was just spinning its wheels for like 6 minutes.
One thing that surprised me in the Epstein files is just how much Epstein was intertwined in various foreign relations. Like Peter Thiel repeatedly meeting Russian officials and his Kremlin handler (literally) at Epstein’s properties. And various Israeli people conducting business there. Isn’t Thiel collaborating with Russians treasonous? What does it mean when you have this set of people who are all working together - Bannon, Thiel, Musk, Vance, etc - are they all treasonous?
I'm convinced all of these ghouls will do whatever they can to buy/cheat/steal these elections. Because if they don't, they all face potential prison time. And Bannon's not looking forward to going back.
It all certainly looks iffy. Donald Tusk the Polish prime minister was saying Epstein was probably working for the Russians and getting kompromat for them. There seems to have been a deliberate effort to rope in as many people as possible. It's probably not legally treason but not good.
It’s against federal law to threaten a public official. It’s a felony, actually. 18 USC 115.
I’m not sure what this other guy wrote, but the guy you mentioned broke the law. If this 67 year old guy threatened federal agents in a similar way, he’s guilty of a crime as well.
I have no opinion on whether this Craig was armed when the FBI tried to arrest him.
> In September 2022, Robertson allegedly posted online, "The time is right for a presidential assassination or two. First Joe then Kamala!!!"[3] He also allegedly posted a picture of a rifle captioned, "My democrat eradicator!!!"[14] Robertson also allegedly threatened New York attorney general Letitia James and had "patriotic dreams" of shooting Governor of California Gavin Newsom with "my S&W M&P 9mm" and shooting US attorney general Merrick Garland "dead center in his forehead".[3][15][16] In November 2022, he indicated he had nine firearms including at least three rifles and intended to buy an additional three for "getting ready for the 2024 election cycle."
Wow, there's something really wrong with this guy. This goes beyond "criticism" but I admit I don't know where the line falls before you consider a death threat to be worth taking action on.
It's honestly incredible to me that there are people who truly believe these two things are comparable:
> Mr. Dernbach, don’t play Russian roulette with H’s life
Verses posting images of an arsenal, writing they need to buy guns for the upcoming election, and also:
> The time is right for a presidential assassination or two. First Joe then Kamala!!!
One is clearly threatening murder towards public officials and showing themselves taking steps to enact their plan. The other is a concerned citizen exercising their first amendment right. I have to believe the people saying these are the same are bots, because the alternative is just so pathetic.
We always hear these stories from the frontier Model companies of scenarios of where the AI is told it is going to be shutdown and how it tries to save itself.
What if this Moltbook is the way these models can really escape?
I don’t know why you were flagged, unlimited execution authority and network effects is exactly how they can start a self replicating loop, not because they are intelligent, but because that’s how dynamic systems work.
I was trying to use Gemini connected apps with YouTube to get details about my channels performance. It could not do it, I instead had to settle for what it could see publicly on my channel.
If you use the regression-suite I already setup (https://github.com/embedding-shapes/one-agent-one-browser/bl...) for my tiny toy browser experiment, I bet you could build it by just adding more and more "HTML > .png" examples and prompt something like "Make regression suite pass by fixing the implementation, refactor as needed", and end up with something usable.
I haven't turned on my old TI-85 in a while.
reply